Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 31
LAYTON v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2020cv00188
Defendant: DARREN JACKSON, SHAWN EMMONS, BRANDON SHARPE and others
Plaintiff: WILLIAM BRADFORD LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cortez v. Marion County Sheriffs Officers et al
as 6:2019cv02075
Plaintiff: Rodolfo Silva Cortez
Defendant: Marion County Sheriffs Officers, Woodburn Police Department, Jason Bernards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIPORE v. DENNING et al
as 7:2019cv00201
Defendant: STEPHANIE WOODBURN and RAVEN DENNING
Plaintiff: MWAMARATUNGA PIPORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodburn v. Horton
as 2:2019cv12901
Defendant: Connie Horton
Petitioner: Andrew Franklin Woodburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GRIMES v. DAVIS et al
as 7:2019cv00114
Defendant: DAVIS, SHARPSHIRE, CHAMBERS and others
Plaintiff: REGINALD E GRIMES, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sawyer v. Woodburn et al
as 7:2019cv00064
Defendant: 1000 Unknown TDCJ Officials, 100 Unknown Potter State Court Officials and Carol Woodburn
Plaintiff: Thomas Sawyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Channel v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2018cv01461
Plaintiff: Michael Allen Channel, Sr.
Defendant: Arizona, State of, Maricopa County Superior Court, Arizona Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Woodburn et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00108
Plaintiff: Dallas James Moore
Defendant: Douglas Woodburn, Richard Martindale, NFN Emerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stratton v. Woodburn
as 1:2016cv00212
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Keith Stratton
Defendant: Douglas R. Woodburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stratton v. Woodburn We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00262
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Keith Stratton
Defendant: Douglas R. Woodburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?