Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Pressley v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 4:2016cv01864
Plaintiff:
Andjoura Sagel Pressley
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Breland v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc et al
as 2:2016cv01854
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Breland
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc , Wal-Mart Stores East LP and Christopher Dodson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sow v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 4:2016cv01865
Plaintiff:
Janey Christal Sow
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00964
Plaintiff:
Robin Hayes
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Latimore v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc et al
as 2:2015cv04751
Plaintiff:
David Latimore, Jr
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc , Wal-Mart Associates Inc , Wal-Mart Stores East LP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WICKS v. WAL-MART DEPT. STORE MANAGER et al
as 1:2015cv00269
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRYANT WICKS
Defendant:
WAL-MART DEPT. STORE MANAGER, LAMAR SKELTON, CONCORD POLICE DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mixson v. Wal-Mart Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv00431
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mark Mixson
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Corporation and Chris D Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Odom v. Mt. Pleasant Police Department
as 10-6312
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM
Defendant - Appellee:
MT. PLEASANT POLICE DEPARTMENT INSURANCE POLICY HOLDER, TOWN OF MT. PLEASANT INSURANCE POLICY HOLDER, WAL-MART INSURANCE POLICY and others
Warren v. Wal-Mart Franchise Managment and Employees
as 1:2007cv03380
Plaintiff:
James A. Warren
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Franchise Managment and Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. Wal-Mart Franchise Management and Employees
as 1:2007cv03183
Plaintiff:
James A. Warren
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Franchise Management and Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
