Cases 71 - 80 of 773
Scott Whittington v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00802
Plaintiff:
Scott Whittington
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. and Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Micolucci v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Anthony Micolucci
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Wescott v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc Associates Health and Welfare Plan
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Sean M Wescott
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc Associates Health and Welfare Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Herrington v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 4:2021cv00505
Plaintiff:
Cliff Herrington
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP d/b/a Wal-Mart, a foreign limited partnership - Wal-Mart
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Vazquez et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 2:2021cv00848
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Vazquez and Elba Vazquez
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Associates Health and Welfare Plan and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
AMANIERA v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP et al
as 9:2021cv82046
Plaintiff:
MARIE AMANIERA
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP and WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Brown v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 6:2021cv01820
Plaintiff:
JENAE BROWN
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Griffith v. Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership et al
as 7:2021cv00081
Plaintiff:
James Griffith
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership and Timothy Borowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sartain v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP et al
as 1:2021cv04192
Plaintiff:
Raven Sartain
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP and Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Cloer v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00189
Plaintiff:
Amy Cloer
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
