Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Walizer v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Michael Walizer
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sutton et al v. California Department of Parks and Recreation et al
as 5:2023cv02057
Defendant:
Armando Quintero, Peter Estes, Andrew Dobbs and others
Plaintiff:
State of California Department of Park & Recreation, Imani Bey Sutton and L. B.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
USA v. Darryl Walizer
as 19-16798
Defendant / Appellant:
DARRYL OWEN WALIZER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Walizer et al
as 1:2019cv00016
Defendant:
Patricia A. Walizer and Richard A. Menger
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Merriman v. Lizarraga et al
as 2:2017cv01701
Plaintiff:
Dominique Merriman
Defendant:
J. Lizarraga, James Telander, Worrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darryl Walizer v. USDC-NVL
as 17-72145
:
In re: DARRYL OWEN WALIZER
Petitioner:
DARRYL OWEN WALIZER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Harrison v. Vendomatic, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00331
Plaintiff:
John Harrison
Defendant:
Vendomatic, Inc. and Robert Walizer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Walizer v. USA
as 2:2016cv00897
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Darryl Owen Walizer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
WALIZER v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv00434
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
GERALDINE WALIZER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Walizer v. USA
as 2:2014cv00423
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Darryl Owen Walizer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
