Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 30
United States of America v. Three Thousand Five Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($3,500.00) in United States Currency et al
as 2:2011cv00602
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Three Thousand Five Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($3,500.00) in United States Currency and 13 Firearms with Assorted Ammunition
Movant: Tracy Katz and Walter M Pasco
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. Real Property Located at 878 9th Street East
as 1:2011cv00032
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Real Property Located at 878 9th Street East
Interested_party: Walter Kolling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. 2005 Chrysler 300C et al
as 1:2011cv00156
Defendant: 2005 Chrysler 300C and $7,027.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant: Caryl Parks-Bowerman and Steffan L. Walters
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Real property located at 15438 Old Toll Road, Camptonville, California, APN: 064-210-041 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00099
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Real property located at 15438 Old Toll Road, Camptonville, California, APN: 064-210-041 and Citizens Bank of Northern California
Claimant: Gregory S. McClellan, Walter M. Saunders and Ramona C. Saunders
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. All Funds Held In the Name Of, Or for the Direct or Indirect Benefit of, Thomas Chrisopher Gibney in Safe Deposit Box #5479 at Citibank Singapore et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv02305
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: All Funds Held In the Name Of, Or for the Direct or Indirect Benefit of, Thomas Chrisopher Gibney in Safe Deposit Box #5479 at Citibank Singapore, All Funds Held In the Name of, Or for the Direct or Indirect Benefit of, Thomas Christopher Gibney in Safe Deposit Box #7150 at Citibank Singapore, All Funds Held In the Name of, Or for the Direct or Indirect Benefit of, Thomas Christopher Gibney, in Customer Account #178577 at Citibank Singapore and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States v. Steris Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00816
Plaintiff: United States
Defendant: Steris Corporation , Walter M. Rosebrough and Peter A. Burke
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 301
United States of America v. Real Property Known and Numbered as 52 North Rodgers Avenue, Columbus, Franklin County, Ohio, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00330
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Real Property Known and Numbered as 52 North Rodgers Avenue, Columbus, Franklin County, Ohio,, Real Property Known and Numbered as 1501 thomas Avenue, Columbus, Franklin County, Ohio, Real Property Known and Numbered as 300 Cypress Avenue, Columbus, Franklin County, Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Grasheim
as 2:2010cv00077
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Walter L Grasheim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA v. Approximately $24,546.25 in U.S. Currency, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00284
Plaintiff: United States
Defendant: Approximately $24,546.25 in U.S. Currency Seized From Farmers and Merchants Bank of Central California Account #547155701, Held in the Name of Steven Walter Butts and Karen Jean Freyling, Approximately $939.73 in U.S. Currency Seized From Farmers and Merchants Bank of Cental California Account #06-576079-01, Held in the Name of Steven Walter Butts, dba Butts DVD Wholesale, Approximately $194.65 in U.S. Currency Seized From Golden 1 Credit Union Account #899973, Held in the Name of Steven Walter Butts and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
United States of America v. Walter
as 5:2007cv00126
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Albert J. Walter and Smith Barney, Citigroup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001 Federal Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?