Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Wade et al v. Lorenz et al
as 4:2026cv01315
Plaintiff:
Terry Wade, Rose Wade, Tyler Wade and others
Defendant:
Brandon Lorenz, SRG Global Coatings, LLC and Farmington Non-Operative Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
DuBose v. Campbell
as 26-30199
Plaintiff:
Walter Allen DuBose
Defendant:
Paul Campbell, Warden and Donna Norman, Nurse
DuBose v. Chenevert
as 3:2025cv00609
Plaintiff:
Walter Allen DuBose
Defendant:
Nikki Chenevert and Marcus Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dubose v. Myers et al
as 1:2025cv00267
Plaintiff:
Walter Allen DuBose
Defendant:
Unidentified Parties, Unknown Physicians, Ochsner L S U Medical Eye Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DuBose v. Myers et al
as 1:2025cv00181
Plaintiff:
Walter Allen DuBose
Defendant:
Marcus Myers, Joseph Hext, Nikki Chenevert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dubose v. Myers et al
as 2:2025cv00242
Plaintiff:
Walter Allen Dubose
Defendant:
Marcus Myers, Joseph Hext, Nikki Chenevert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv01647
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri, Donald Hawkins, Walter Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DuBose v. Campbell et al
as 3:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Walter Allen DuBose
Defendant:
Paul Campbell, Donna Norman, Chris Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dubose v. Campbell et al
as 2:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Walter Allen Dubose
Defendant:
Paul Campbell, Donna Norman, Chris Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
