Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Rodriguez v. Geico General Insurance Company, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00423
Plaintiff:
Wanda Rodriguez
Defendant:
Geico General Insurance Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2492
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 0:2011cv60241
Plaintiff:
Wanda Rodriguez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205
Rodriguez-Diaz v. Penn National Insurance et al
as 3:2010cv01016
Plaintiff:
Wanda Rodriguez-Diaz
Defendant:
Penn National Insurance, B.C. Bundt, Inc., White Rose Foods and others
Third_party_defendant:
A. Cordero Badillo, Inc. or Empresas Cordero Badillo, Inc. d/b/a Supermercado Grande
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
White Rose Foods
Cross_claimant:
White Rose Foods
Cross_defendant:
Penn National Insurance and B.C. Bundt, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2009cv00553
Plaintiff:
HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
Defendant:
Carlos J. Rodriguez and Wanda Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Avellanet-Quinones et al v. Gonzalez-Colon et al
as 3:2007cv02113
Plaintiff:
Carlos A. Avellanet-Quinones, Carlos A. Avellanet-Quinones, Wanda Rodriguez-Palmer and others
Defendant:
Luis R. Gonzalez-Colon, Jane Doe 1, Conjugal Partnership Gonzalez-Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Guidant Corporation et al
as 0:2006cv03597
Plaintiff:
Wanda Rodriguez
Defendant:
Guidant Corporation, Guidant Sales Corporation, Cardiac Pacemakers Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
