Cases 1 - 10 of 22
ATKINS v. WARDEN OF HUDSON COUNTY REHABILITATION CENTER et al
as 2:2022cv03712
Petitioner:
MARK ATKINS
Respondent:
WARDEN OF HUDSON COUNTY REHABILITATION CENTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In Re: The Estate of Brian Keith Bennett et al v. Gomez et al
as 6:2022cv00045
In Re:
The Estate of Brian Keith Bennett
Executor:
Wanda Ellen Bennett and Michael Keith Bennett
Defendant:
Warden C. Gomez, John or Jane Doe, John or Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Civil Rights - Bivens Action
JEFFERSON v. WARDEN OF HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2021cv04315
Defendant:
WARDEN OF HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff:
TYHEED JEFFERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Butler, et al
as 2:2021cv00774
Defendant:
Patterson, Lt Ross, Officer Stout and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARSHALEK v. WARDEN OF HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 2:2021cv00957
Petitioner:
MICHAEL SHAUN MARSHALEK
Respondent:
JUDGE OF CRIMINAL COURT, WARDEN OF HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER and JUDGE OF NJ FAMILY COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dembry v. Hudson
as 20-3123
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN DON HUDSON
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDWARD KEITH DEMBRY
Chambers v. Mayberry et al
as 3:2019cv50319
Defendant:
Lt. Muella, Lt. Erskine, Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Roscoe Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. Hudson
as 1:2019cv06654
Petitioner:
Ramon D. Brown
Respondent:
Warden D. Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Hudson
as 3:2019cv50216
Petitioner:
Joseph Jackson
Respondent:
Warden A. Hudson and Donald Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv16550
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
