Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Daniel McClain v. Lefford Fate
as 16-7470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL R. MCCLAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
LEFFORD FATE, et alia, SAMUEL SOLTIS, Assc Dir, JOHN B. TOMARCHIO, Med Dir and others
Daniel McClain v. Lefford Fate
as 16-7474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL R. MCCLAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
LEFFORD FATE, et alia, SAMUEL SOLTIS, Assc Dir, JOHN B. TOMARCHIO, Med Dir and others
James Edward Topper v. Dean Borders et al
as 5:2016cv01089
Defendant:
Warden Dean Borders, Howard Chen, Nahid Farooq and others
Plaintiff:
James Edward Topper
McClain v. Fate et al
as 0:2015cv04516
Plaintiff:
Daniel R McClain
Defendant:
Lefford Fate, Samuel Soltis, John B Tomarchio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Stanley Moultrie v. William Byars, Jr.
as 15-7358
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY LEE MOULTRIE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM BYARS, JR., South Carolina Department of Corrections Director, BRYAN P. STIRLING, GOVERNOR NIKKI HALEY and others
Stanley Lee Moultrie v. William Byars, Jr.
as 14-7873
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY LEE MOULTRIE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM BYARS, JR., South Carolina Department of Corrections Director, BRYAN P. STIRLING, DEPUTY DIRECTOR ROBERT WARD and others
Stanley Moultrie v. William Byars, Jr.
as 14-7123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY LEE MOULTRIE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM BYARS, JR., South Carolina Department of Corrections Director, BRYAN P. STIRLING, GOVERNOR NIKKI HALEY and others
Vaughn v. Blanchard et al
as 6:2014cv00201
Defendant:
Warden Dean Blanchard and R Maldonado
Plaintiff:
Gary Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moultrie v. Byars et al
as 9:2014cv01690
Plaintiff:
Stanley Lee Moultrie
Defendant:
William Byars, Jr , Bryan P Stirling , Nikki Haley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary Vaughn v. Dean Blanchard, et al
as 14-40198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY VAUGHN
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN DEAN BLANCHARD and R. MALDONADO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
