Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Alli v. Sterling et al
as 1:2024cv02734
Plaintiff:
Umar Alli
Defendant:
Sterling, Edmund, Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01346
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Hunt
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COMMISIONER BLANCHE CARNEY, DEPUTY WARDEN HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
MASON v. PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2022cv03312
Plaintiff:
TYRONE AUGUSTIS MASON and TYRONE AUGUSTIS MASON, JR.
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS, CORIZON HEALTH, DEPUTY WARDEN HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoffmeyer v. Ohio Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv00752
Defendant:
DRC Director Annette Chambers-Smith, Warden Harris, Mr. Hudson and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Hoffmeyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoffmeyer v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 1:2020cv00637
Defendant:
Warden Harris, Mr. Hudson, Director Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Hoffmeyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dontez Johnson v. OH, et al
as 20-3783
Defendant / Appellee:
DIRECTOR ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, CORRECTION OFFICER BAILEY SPICER, STATE OF OHIO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONTEZ JOHNSON
Dodd v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2019cv00021
Plaintiff:
Roger Lavoy Dodd
Defendant:
Warden Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spring v. Brandyshawn
as 4:2018cv02920
Respondent:
Warden Harris Brandyshawn and Warden Brandeshawn Harris
Petitioner:
Jeffrey M. Spring and Jeffrey M. Spring, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Green v. Davis et al
as 9:2018cv00222
Defendant:
Warden Harris, Unknown Oneil, Lorie Davis and others
Plaintiff:
El Jerome Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hyder v. Warden Perez et al
as 4:2018cv04179
Defendant:
Polunsky Unit Classification Commitee, Warden Harris and Warden Perez
Plaintiff:
Calvin Hyder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
