Cases 31 - 40 of 76
Michael Moller v. Warden Kelly
as 23-6366
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. MOLLER
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN KELLY, FCI Butner 2
CANNAFAX v. BUCKS COUNTY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2023cv01274
Plaintiff:
JEREMY TYLER CANNAFAX and JEREMY KYLE CANNAFAX
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, WARDEN MATELLUS, DEPUTY WARDEN KELLY REED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith v. Kelly et al
as 5:2023hc02064
Petitioner:
Anin M. Keith
Respondent:
Warden Kelly and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fairlamb v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02045
Petitioner:
Scott Fairlamb
Respondent:
Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cherenfant v. FCC Butner Wardens et al
as 5:2023ct03023
Plaintiff:
Nertant Cherenfant
Defendant:
FCC Butner Wardens, FCI 2 Butner, Warden Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Moller v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02009
Petitioner:
Michael J. Moller
Respondent:
Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Staton v. United States of America
as 5:2022hc02217
Petitioner:
Jonathan Edward Staton
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McFadden v. Santoro
as 4:2022cv07504
Petitioner:
Akeim Rashad McFadden
Respondent:
Warden Kelly Santoro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kedzie v. Kelly
as 5:2022hc02190
Petitioner:
Adam Phillips Kedzie
Respondent:
Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Crowder v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2022cv02267
Plaintiff:
Joe Crowder
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Lorie Davis, Warden Crosby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
