Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Builder v. Borecky et al
as 1:2013cv05809
Defendant:
Nurse Ahijble, Dr. Borecky, Nurse Dilone and others
Plaintiff:
Emperor Builder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mendez v. Merson, et al
as 1:2013cv00968
Plaintiff:
Ivan L. Mendez, White American Cowgirls and Cowboys and Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
Defendant:
Irse M. Merson, Grievance Chairpersons Office Personnel, Mental Health Personnel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Johnson, et al
as 1:2012cv00189
Plaintiff:
Jerry Don Williams
Defendant:
Valarie Johnson, Tiffany Elmore, Razzilia Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irving Twitty v. SCDC
as 11-7430
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IRVING E. TWITTY
Defendant - Appellee:
SCDC, Classification Representative's Headquarters Dept., JAMES BRENNAN, Director of Classification-Records, LINDA B. DEAN, Institution Classification Case Manager and others
Anthany Kaden v. Daryl Slykhuis, et al
as 10-2751
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthany Kaden
Defendant - Appellee:
Daryl Slykhuis, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary, Samantha Stobbe, Unit Coordinator (Ret.), SCO D Ewer, Mailroom and others
Anthany Kaden v. Daryl Slykhuis, et al
as 10-2154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthany Kaden
Defendant - Appellee:
Daryl Slykhuis, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary, Samantha Stobbe, Unit Coordinator (Ret.), SCO D Ewer, Mailroom and others
Groves v. Truth Expense Office et al
as 3:2009cv50298
Plaintiff:
Kareem Groves
Defendant:
Truth Expense Office, Trust Expense Office, Property Warden Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bender v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2008cv00068
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Bender
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Penitentiary Hazelton, Warden's Office and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
