Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Goodloe v. Matevousion et al
as 4:2024cv00695
Petitioner:
Ronald E. Goodloe
Respondent:
Andre Matevousion, Warden Thomas E. Bargami and B. Potes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HUGHSTON v. MCGEE et al
as 2:2023cv01898
Plaintiff:
KENJAH J. HUGHSTON
Defendant:
WARDEN SEAN P. MCGEE, ASSISTANT WARDEN THOMAS BERGER, BOARD OF INSPECTORS OF MCCF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAPOZZI v. GUBBIOTTI et al
as 1:2022cv01659
Petitioner:
FRANK J. CAPOZZI
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMAS GUBBIOTTI and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DAVIS v. BERGAMI
as 1:2021cv15868
Plaintiff:
DONALD LEWIS DAVIS
Defendant:
WARDEN THOMAS E. BERGAMI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUFFALO v. ELBEL et al
as 3:2021cv00039
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, TROOPERS JOHN AND JANE DOE 1-20, WARDEN THOMAS ELBEL, JEFFERSON COUNTY JAIL CORRECTIONS OFFICERS JOHN AND JANE DOE 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
MIKAYLA DUFFALO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
COCHRAN v. MCGINLEY et al
as 2:2018cv01577
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY and WARDEN THOMAS MCGINLEY
Petitioner:
KALULE COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John Peters, Sr. v. Jason Brown, et al
as 17-3087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN BRADLEY PETERS, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHIEF JASON BROWN, SERGEANT KEVIN BICKLE, OFFICER WILLIAM GALLAGHER and others
Kenneth Murchison v. Warden Lewisburg USP, et al
as 14-3077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH MURCHISON
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN LEWISBURG USP, POTTER, DR. PIGOS and others
Njos v. Thomas
as 3:2014cv00766
Petitioner:
Scott Njos
Respondent:
Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robertson v Thomas
as 3:2014cv00264
Petitioner:
Marco Miguel Robertson
Receiver:
Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
