Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 30
PARKER v. HAALAND et al
as 2:2022cv05049
Plaintiff: JAMAL DARIUS PARKER Moor Beneficiary a Emperor, a Noble a Merchant, Admiral, Piloter, Seaman, Mariner, Shereef in propria persona Sui Juris, majoris aetatis suae d/b/a Jamal El Trust
Defendant: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND d/b/a Debra Anne Haaland, secretary of the interior et al.,, MERRICK BRIAN GARLAND d/b/a MERRICK GARLAND attorney general et al.,, ANDREW MARSHALL SAUL d/b/a ANDREW SAUL commissioner et al., and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raskin v. Northeast Washington Alliance Counseling Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00232
Plaintiff: Stephanie R Raskin
Defendant: Northeast Washington Alliance Counseling Services, Stevens County, Clear Risk Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Jamal Parker v. Antony Blinken, et al
as 22-16331
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMAL DARIUS PARKER, Moor beneficiary, in personam, a Emperor, Admiral Marine, Merchant Piloter, AKA Jamal El Trust, DBA Jamal Darius Parker
Defendant / Appellee: ANTONY BLINKEN, Secretary of State, United States Department of State, Heirs and Assignees, DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, Secretary of the Interior, Department of the Interior, Heirs and Assignees, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Heirs and Assignees and others
Anne Block v. Washington State Bar Associati, et al
as 21-35922
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANNE BLOCK, Esquire, an individual
Defendant / Appellee: WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, LINDA EIDE, individually and in her capacity as an employee of defendant Washington State Bar Association, MARK PLIVILECH, in his individual capacity and in his marital community with wife and/or domestic partner defendant Lin O'Dell and others
Jamal Parker v. State of Arizona, et al
as 21-16325
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMAL DARIUS PARKER, Moor beneficiary, Jamal El Trust, AKA Jamal El Trust, DBA Jamal Darius Parker
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Brown v. Superior Court of the State of Washington King County We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00932
Petitioner: Maurice Anthony Brown
Respondent: Superior Court of the State of Washington King County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anne Block v. Washington State Bar Associati, et al
as 20-35025
Defendant / Appellee: LINDA LOEN, individually, and in her capacity as defendant City of Gold Bar Mayor and Public Records Officer, KALI MATUSKA, individually, and in her official capacity as an employee of defendant Port of Seattle, JOHN LOVICK, individually, and in his official capacity as an employee of defendant Snohomish County and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANNE BLOCK, Esquire, an individual
USA v. Diana Nemes, et al
as 18-35698
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellant: DIANA NEMES
Defendant: REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 16549 VAIL ROAD SE, YELM, WASHINGTON, Thurston County Parcel Number 22630220000 and REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 16545 VAIL ROAD, SE, YELM, WASHINGTON, Thurston County Parcel Number 22630220100
Josiah English, III v. Theodore Campagnolo, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-16258
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOSIAH ENGLISH III
Defendant - Appellee: THEODORE CAMPAGNOLO, Maricopa County Superior Court Judge in his individual and official capacity, TYLER KIPPER, #08151, Detective, Phoenix Police Department in his individual and official capacity, JOSEPH NEWBERN, #07390, Detective, Phoenix, Police Department in his individual and official capacity and others
Webb v Superior Court of the State of Washington King County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00762
Plaintiff: Anthony Webb
Defendant: Superior Court of the State of Washington King County, Bill A. Bowman, Kelsey K Schirman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?