Cases 31 - 40 of 2,602
Washington v. Gas South, LLC
as 1:2023cv06022
Petitioner:
Deijohn Washington
Respondent:
Gas South, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 4 Petition to order arbitration; failure to arbitrate
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Fallon v. Washington et al
as 8:2023cv02938
Plaintiff:
Mary Fallon
Defendant:
Marlon Washington, LaBrea Trucking, LLC and Geico General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Hollins v. Hill et al
as 1:2023cv05890
Plaintiff:
Chryshon Hollins
Defendant:
Sheriff Victor Hill, Kendrix Burns, Anthony Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sylestine et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv01721
Plaintiff:
Ralph Jason Sylestine, Thomas Stock, Rodney Stockman and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
WASHINGTON v. JONES et al
as 3:2023cv24756
Plaintiff:
MARLO WASHINGTON
Defendant:
G JONES, HERNANDEZ and SABRINA POTTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Chang
as 0:2023cv62361
Petitioner:
Washington Perry
Respondent:
Lisa Latoya Chang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
In re: John Demos
as 23-14052
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN R. DEMOS
Respondent:
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, WASHINGTON TERRITORY and others
Cindy Washington v. Pat Wang, et al
as 23-14035
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CINDY ELAINE WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
PAT WANG, CHRISTOPHER W. CONWAY, LASANJE HOLLINGER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
