Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Callahan et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2019cv01783
Plaintiff:
The Regents of the University of Michigan, Randall Callahan, Michael Wingate and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Susan Jackson and Charles Bennett
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services and United Network for Organ Sharing
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
GUILFORD COLLEGE et al v. NIELSEN et al
as 1:2018cv00891
Plaintiff:
FOOTHILL-DE ANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT, THE NEW SCHOOL, GUILFORD COLLEGE and others
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN and others
Amicus Curiae:
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, BENNINGTON COLLEGE, ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Regents of University of California et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2017cv05211
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Elaine Duke, Former Federal Immigration and Homeland Security Officials and others
Plaintiff:
Regents of University of California, Janet Napolitano and UC Regents
Petitioner:
City of Seattle, U.S. Conference of Mayors, City of West Hollywood and others
Amicus Curiae:
Services, Immigrant Rights, and Education Network, West Contra Costa Unified School District, Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Batalla Vidal, et al. v. Nielsen, et al.
as 1:2016cv04756
Defendant:
Baran, Kathy A. Baran, Kelvin Medlock and others
Plaintiff:
Batalla Vidal, Eliana Fernandez, Carolina Fung Feng and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County (LASSMC), Service Employees International Union, African Services Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
