Cases 41 - 50 of 6,335
Invenergy Thermal LLC, et al. v. Watson
as 23-3857
Plaintiff / Appellant:
INVENERGY THERMAL LLC and GRAYS HARBOR ENERGY, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
LAURA WATSON, in her official capacity as Director of the Washington State Department of Ecology
Jordan v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, et al.
as 23-3767
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES B. JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, WATSON, Deputy at Stanley Mosk Court, official capacity, PLATT, Detective, Los Angeles Police Department and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jefferson WatsonIn re: Jefferson Watson
as 23-13818
Petitioner:
In re: JEFFERSON WATSON
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10030
Plaintiff:
UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund, UFOA FAMILY PROTECTION PLAN LOCAL 854, UFOA FOR RETIRED FIRE OFFICERS FAMILY PROTECTION PLAN and others
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Watson Lee v. ConnectIQ Labs, Inc.
as 5:2023cv02316
Plaintiff:
Watson Lee
Defendant:
ConnectIQ Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Watson v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00611
Plaintiff:
Brian M Watson
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Thomas R. Greco and Jeffrey W. Shepherd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
