Cases 21 - 30 of 119
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
BARTZOKAS v. NINGBO CHEN XIN PHOTOELECTRIC TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, LTD et al
as 2:2023cv01967
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE BARTZOKAS
Defendant:
NINGBO CHEN XIN PHOTOELECTRIC TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, LTD, CHEXIN OPTOELECTRONIC COMPANY, LTD, WAYFAIR LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00149
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Arturo Munos Ruiz v. Wayfair, LLC
as 5:2022cv01552
Plaintiff:
ARTURO MUNOS RUIZ
Defendant:
WAYFAIR, LLC, Christopher Gutierrez, Joe Matus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-4091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Implicit, LLC v. Wayfair Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00940
Plaintiff:
Implicit, LLC
Defendant:
Wayfair Inc. and Wayfair LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Lexington Luminance LLC v. Wayfair LLC
as 6:2022cv01017
Plaintiff:
Lexington Luminance LLC
Defendant:
Wayfair LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
