Cases 1 - 10 of 1,250
ALWARD v. MDOC et al
as 2:2024cv01894
Petitioner:
MATTHEW KEITH ALWARD and MATTHEW KEITH BERRY
Respondent:
MDOC, WASHTENAW COUNTY and WAYNE COUNTY COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baugh v. The City of Detroit et al
as 2:2024cv11175
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Baugh
Defendant:
The City of Detroit, joann Miller and Wayne County Prosecutors Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Baugh v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2024cv11177
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Baugh
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Wayne County Prosecutors Office and Joann Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Leggett v. Wayne County et al
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Cooper Leggett
Defendant:
Wayne County, Wayne County Board of Supervisors, Hal Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Ameren Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00047
Defendant:
EEMSCO, Ameren Corporation, Barry Electric Cooperative and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Carlock v. Harper Woods, City of et al
as 2:2024cv11122
Plaintiff:
James Carlock
Defendant:
City of Harper Woods, Glen Heaney, Matthew Closurdo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baugh v. Miller et al
as 2:2024cv11126
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Baugh
Defendant:
Joann Miller, The City of Detroit and Wayne County Prosecutors Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Miles v. Wayne County Treasurer et al
as 2:2024cv11125
Plaintiff:
Charles Miles
Defendant:
Wayne County Treasurer and Detroit Treasurer Office
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kelly Key v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 24-1348
Plaintiff:
KELLY ROYCE KEY
Defendant:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI and WAYNE COUNTY, MI TREASURER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
