Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Westover v. USA
as 1:2023cv00170
Petitioner:
David Wayne Westover
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Eli v. Nelson County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
Wayne Allen Eli
Defendant:
Nelson County Sheriff's Department, Danielle Bjorlie, John A. Thelen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Oien v. Pringle
as 3:2023cv00081
Petitioner:
Jason Wayne Oien
Respondent:
Chad Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oien v. North Dakota, State of
as 3:2023cv00066
Petitioner:
Jason Wayne Oien
Respondent:
North Dakota, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oien v. Pringle
as 3:2022cv00157
Petitioner:
Jason Wayne Oien
Respondent:
Chad Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Drake v. Stenehjem et al
as 1:2020cv00231
Defendant:
Wayne Stenehjem, Dick Gulmon, Jeffrey Erickson and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Drake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powerhouse Gaming, Inc. v. Stenehjem et al
as 1:2020cv00128
Defendant:
Wayne Stenehjem and Deborah McDaniel
Plaintiff:
Powerhouse Gaming, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poemoceah v. Morton County, North Dakota et al
as 1:2020cv00053
Defendant:
Benjamin V. Swenson, Morton County, North Dakota, Kyle Kirchmeier and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Wayne Poemoceah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SpoofCard, LLC et al v. Burgum et al
as 1:2019cv00276
Defendant:
Hon. Doug Burgum and Hon. Wayne Stenehjem
Plaintiff:
Amanda Pietrocola and SpoofCard, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Przybylski v. State of North Dakota et al
as 3:2019cv00241
Defendant:
State of North Dakota, U.S. Border Patrol, County of Grand Forks and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Paul Przybylski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
