Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Carver v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01200
Plaintiff:
Billy Wayne Carver
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Carver v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2021cv04003
Plaintiff:
Billy Wayne Carver
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew Saul and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Carver v. Greenville County et al
as 1:2016cv02528
Plaintiff:
Keith Wayne Carver, Jr
Defendant:
Greenville County, Greenville County Detention Center, Vandermosen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Carver v. USA
as 14-15769
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMOTHY WAYNE CARVER
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Carver v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 6:2014cv06130
Plaintiff:
Wayne Carver
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Ray Hobbs, Wendy Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carver v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 4:2014cv00603
Plaintiff:
Wayne Carver
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Ray Hobbs, Wendy Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carver v. Central Processing Corp
as 2:2013cv02077
Plaintiff:
Wayne Carver
Defendant:
Central Processing Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Carver v. United States of America
as 2:2012cv14353
Petitioner:
Timothy Wayne Carver
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
USA v. Timothy Carver
as 10-11599
Plaintiff - Appellee:
USA
Defendant - Appellant:
TIMOTHY WAYNE CARVER
Carver v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2008cv00190
Plaintiff:
Montana Wayne Carver
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Board of Parole and Post Prison Supervision, Mr. Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
