Cases 1 - 10 of 322
Rouse v. Godfrey et al
as 5:2024ct03115
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lindell Rouse
Defendant:
John Godfrey, Marshall Pike, Cathy Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Creel v. Gary Junker
as 24-6449
Plaintiff:
KENNETH RAY CREEL
Defendant:
GARY JUNKER, DR. ARTHUR CAMPBELL, DEBRA FITZGERALD and others
WRIGHT v. RANSOM et al
as 1:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
KAYIE SHAUNE DEVORE WRIGHT
Defendant:
GENO RANSOM, FNU POTRELLA, FNU L. BULLARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. USA
as 5:2024cv00237
Petitioner:
Lemont Jerrone Webb
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Webb v. USA
as 3:2024cv00234
Petitioner:
Calvarsi Shamar Webb
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hanson v. Lee et al
as 5:2024ct03066
Plaintiff:
Rodger Hanson
Defendant:
Warden Talena Lee, Sergeant Randle, Unit Manager Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy Honea v. Fred Webb
as 23-7276
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ALLEN HONEA
Defendant:
FRED WEBB, Attorney, sued in their individual and official capacities, BOB BOYKIN, Private Investigator, sued in their individual and official capacities, ROBERT SHARPE, Director of Capital Defender Office, sued in their individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03014
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HONEA v. WEBB et al
as 1:2023cv00829
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ALLEN HONEA
Defendant:
FRED WEBB, BOB BOYKIN, ROBERT SHARPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
