Cases 1 - 10 of 100
CITY OF SOUTHFIELD FIRE AND POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. COGENT COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2026cv02609
Plaintiff:
CITY OF SOUTHFIELD FIRE AND POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Board of Trustees
Defendant:
COGENT COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC., DAVID SCHAEFFER and THADDEUS G. WEED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Weed et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv07041
Plaintiff:
Katie Weed, Paul Weed, Jr. and Estate of Vincent Weed
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, LLC, Snap, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Guydos v. Weed et al
as 2:2026cv00267
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Guydos
Defendant:
Officer Tim Weed, Officer Erick Quezada, Officer Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Muwsay Tulu v. H. Williams
as 26-6694
Plaintiff:
MUWSAY IBN IBRAHIM TULU
Defendant:
H. P. WILLIAMS and PATRICK BENTON WEEDE
Turf Star, Inc. et al
as 8:2026cv01546
Petitioner:
Turf Star, Inc. and Weeding Technologies, LTD. d/b/a Weedingtech
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Weed v. Humana Inc.
as 1:2026cv06284
Plaintiff:
Corey Weed
Defendant:
Humana Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
WEED v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv03915
Plaintiff:
TAMRA WEED
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Weed v. Sheridan et al
as 2:2026cv03040
Plaintiff:
Laura Sue Weed
Defendant:
Jerry Sheridan and Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Weeds
as 3:2026cv01054
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
W. Weeds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
