Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Weed v. Humana Inc.
as 1:2026cv06284
Plaintiff:
Corey Weed
Defendant:
Humana Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
WEED v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv03915
Plaintiff:
TAMRA WEED
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mai et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 4:2026cv04099
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Mai, David Rosenholtz, Brian Portella and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Weed v. Sheridan et al
as 2:2026cv03040
Plaintiff:
Laura Sue Weed
Defendant:
Jerry Sheridan and Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Weeds
as 3:2026cv01054
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
W. Weeds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
(PS) Smith v. Coates et al
as 2:2026cv01236
Plaintiff:
Jodi Smith
Defendant:
Ryan Coates, City of Weed and Weed Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Weed v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 3:2026cv00791
Plaintiff:
Donald Travis Weed
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fund Transfer Act
Moore #337243 v. Hobbs et al
as 2:2026cv01264
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Aaron Moore and Maddi Moore
Defendant:
Katie Hobbs, Kris Mayes, Joseph W Malka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caprice et al v. The United States of America
as 1:2026cv00158
Plaintiff:
Caprice Caprice, Norman B. Calvert and Any and All Other Co-Complaintants who were adversely affected and or imprisoned by America's outrageously restrictive weed laws for years and years and years since Sept. 7, 2016
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
