Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 378
United States of America v. 762,201.48 Seized From U.S. Bank Account No. 8773 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01829
Defendant: $961,136.43 Seized From Wells Fargo Bank Account No. '0383, $397,883.73 Seized From Wells Fargo Bank Account No. '1199, $762,201.48 Seized From U.S. Bank Account No. '8773 and others
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant: Khaled J. Al-Sabah
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. $601,869.18 in United States currency formerly on deposit in Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Account Number 6250628085, held in the name of First Financial Investment Groups, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01592
Defendant: $601,869.18 in United States currency formerly on deposit in Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Account Number 6250628085, held in the name of First Financial Investment Groups, LLC
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $800,000 seized from Wells Fargo Account ending 5799
as 1:2021cv00205
Defendant: $800,000 seized from Wells Fargo Account ending 5799
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant: 2010 Trust
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. Approximately $4,887.00 in U.S. Currency et al
as 2:2021at00156
Defendant: Approximately $403.73 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 5677962762, Approximately $55.50 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 2693068070, Approximately $2,120.75 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 2803490131 and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
USA v. Approx. $4,887.00 in U.S. Currency, et al., We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021mc00043
Defendant: Approximately $403.73 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 5677962762, Approximately $55.50 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 2693068070, Approximately $2,120.75 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 2803490131 and others
Claimant: Doo Chul Kim
Plaintiff: United States of America
United States of America v. 43,590.79 in Bank Funds Seized from Two Wells Fargo Bank Accounts et al
as 2:2021cv01380
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and United States of America
Defendant: $43,590.79 IN BANK FUNDS SEIZED FROM TWO WELLS FARGO BANK ACCOUNTS, $11,621.10 IN BANK FUNDS SEIZED FROM ONE EAST WEST BANK ACCOUNT, 11,621.10 in Bank Funds Seized from One East West Bank Account and others
Claimant: Shaobo Yu, Queena Qi and Xin Qi
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. $29,945.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 4:2021cv00291
Defendant: $29,945.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Plaintiff: United States of America
Counter Claimant: Brittany Wells and Brandon Wells
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $902,746.64 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account #2525, et al
as 4:2020cv00960
Defendant: $902,746.64 in Unites States Currency, Assorted Jewelry seized from Reshma Damanwalla on June 18, 2020, $34,424.46 seized from Whitney and Hancock Bank Account #0205 on June 19, 2020 and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $662,632.00 Seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account 5342 et al
as 4:2020cv04279
Defendant: $662,632.00 Seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account 5342, $252,845.11 Seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank Account 8897, $500,000.00 Seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank Account 7085 and others
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
USA v. Approx. $42,687.68,et al., We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020mc00301
Defendant: Approximately $143.04 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 530-4807349, Approximately $1,840.42 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 517-7263489, Approximately $50.08 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 333-4403940 and others
Plaintiff: United States of America

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?