Cases 31 - 40 of 695
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv13243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Remona Charles v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 23-2709
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REMONA L. CHARLES
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Shock v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE CASE # 5:23-CV-466-D-RN
as 4:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Bradley Shock
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and David Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK. Case
Shock v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 5:2023cv00466
Plaintiff:
Bradley Shock
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and David Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK. Case
ABDI v. WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.
as 2:2023cv07163
Plaintiff:
ALI ABDI
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
