Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Redmon et al v. Advanced Electrical Systems, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00090
Plaintiff:
Thomas Spivey, Cameron Goesman, Wesley Hawkins and others
Defendant:
Advanced Electrical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fl
Vawter et al v. Porch.com Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00752
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Adame, Chris Oetzel, Todd Thaw and others
Defendant:
GoSmith Inc., Brenton Marrelli, Porch.com Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Chanod Lamar, et al v. City of Tallahassee, FL, et al
as 13-15129
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHANOD LAMAR and CARL WARREN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA and WESLEY HAWKINS, Individually
ROGERS v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE et al
as 4:2013cv00411
Defendant:
CITY OF TALLAHASSEE , WESLEY HAWKINS , RONALD ROBERTS and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keene v. Hawkins et al
as 2:2013cv00049
Plaintiff:
Brittany Mae Keene
Defendant:
John Wesley Hawkins and Barbour County Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LAMAR et al v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE
as 4:2012cv00522
Plaintiff:
CHANOD LAMAR and CARL WARREN
Defendant:
CITY OF TALLAHASSEE and WESLEY HAWKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SAMPLE et al v. CONGRESSIONAL SWITCHBOARD OPERATORS et al
as 1:2012cv00099
Plaintiff:
BRANDON C. SAMPLE, BERNARD SHAW, RUSSELL MARKS and others
Defendant:
CONGRESSIONAL SWITCHBOARD OPERATORS, WHITE HOUSE SWITCHBOARD OPERATORS, UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Birmingham, City of et al
as 2:2008cv01601
Plaintiff:
Grant Wesley Hawkins
Defendant:
Birmingham, City of, Birmingham Police Department and Police Chief
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LING v. POPPE et al
as 4:2007cv00241
Plaintiff:
BRUCE A LING, JR
Defendant:
DONALD POPPE, WESLEY HAWKINS, CITY OF TALLAHASSEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
