Cases 41 - 50 of 1,264
American Refining Group, Inc., et al v. EPA
as 23-1243
Petitioner:
American Refining Group, Inc., Calumet Montana Refining, LLC, Calumet Shreveport Refining, LLC and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Castro v. Warner et al
as 2:2023cv00598
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Castro
Defendant:
Secretary of State Andrew Warner and Donald John Trump
Intervenor:
West Virginia Republican Party and State of West Virginia
Amicus Curiae:
Joseph L. Westfall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
State of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al
as 23-1183
Petitioner:
State of Ohio, State of West Virginia and State of Indiana
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
VB BTS, LLC v. Jefferson County, West Virginia et al
as 3:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
VB BTS, LLC
Defendant:
Jefferson County, West Virginia and The Jefferson County Planning Commission
Petitioner:
Corey T. Ash, Tommy Ash, Cheryl Avery and others
West Virginia Highlands Conservancy v. ERP Environmental Fund, Inc
as 23-1696
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WEST VIRGINIA HIGHLANDS CONSERVANCY and SIERRA CLUB
Appellee:
APPALACHIAN HEADWATERS, INC, Nonparty in whose favor an order has been entered
Defendant / Appellant:
ERP ENVIRONMENTAL FUND, INC and RECEIVERSHIP ESTATE OF ERP ENVIRONMENTAL FUND, INC.
Appellant:
VCLF LAND TRUST, INC, Nonparty against whom an order may be enforced
Receiver:
DOSS SPECIAL RECEIVER, LLC
United States of America et al v. Messer LLC
as 5:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
United States of America and State of West Virginia
Defendant:
Messer LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Living Lands, LLC v. Harold Ward
as 23-1641
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LIVING LANDS, LLC, a West Virginia Limited Liability Company and D. C. CHAPMAN VENTURES, INC., a West Virginia Business Corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD WARD, In his official capacity as the Cabinet Secretary of the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, an instrumentality of the State of West Virginia
Defendant:
JACK CLINE, an Individual West Virginia Resident, ROBERT LEE CLINE, an Individual West Virginia Resident, BRADY CLINE COAL CO., a dissolved West Virginia Business Corporation, solely to the extent of its undistributed assets, specifically including the remaining limits of its available liability coverage under liability insurance policies and others
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 23-2411
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of West Virginia, State of North Dakota, State of Georgia and others
Not Yet Classified:
American Farm Bureau Federation, American Petroleum Institute, American Road and Transportation Builders Association and others
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan, In His Official Capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor:
Chickaloon Village Traditional Council, Rappahannock Tribe, Tohono O'Odham Nation and others
State of Iowa, et al v. EPA, et al
as 23-1144
Petitioner:
State of Iowa, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Arizona, State of et al v. Michael D Lansky LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Arizona, State of, Alabama, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Defendant:
Michael D Lansky LLC an Arizona limited liability company doing business as Avid Telecom, Michael D Lansky individually as a Member/Manager/Chief Executive Officer of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom and Stacy S Reeves individually as a Manager/Vice President of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
