Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Crista Eggers, et al v. Robert Evnen
as 22-2268
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Crista Eggers and Nebraskans for Medical Marijuana, NMM
Defendant / Appellant:
Robert B. Evnen
Appellant:
State of Arkansas, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Not Yet Classified:
Raise the Wage Nebraska, Anthony B. Schutz, Steven R. Dunbar and others
Robinson v. Ardoin
as 22-30333
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Press Robinson, Edgar Cage, Dorothy Nairne and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Kyle Ardoin, in his official capacity as Secretary of State for Louisiana
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Clay Schexnayder, Patrick Page Cortez and State of Louisiana - Attorney General Jeff Landry
Amicus Curiae:
State of Alabama, State of Arkansas, State of Georgia and others
Not Classified By Court:
James F. Blumstein
Ostrowski v. Office of Elections et al
as 1:2020cv00209
Defendant:
Lt. Governor Spencer Cox, Secretary of State Jim Condos, Wisconsin Election Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ostrowski
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437
Nelson et al v. Warner et al
as 3:2019cv00898
Defendant:
Mac Warner and Vera McCormick
Plaintiff:
Dakota Nelson, West Virginia Democratic House Legislative Committee, West Virginia Democratic Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hyman et al v. City Of Salem, West Virginia
as 1:2019cv00075
Plaintiff:
Chad Thompson, Marissa Rinehart and Willaim Hyman
Defendant:
City Of Salem, West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daly et al v. Tennant et al
as 3:2016cv08981
Plaintiff:
Naomi Spencer Daly and Darrell Castle
Defendant:
Natalie Tennant and Brian Wood
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Dorrel W. Arthur
Amicu:
American Civil Liberties Union of West Virginia Foundation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. State of North Carolina
as 16-1529
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and KIM WESTBROOK STRACH
Intervenor Defendant:
CHRISTINA KELLEY GALLEGOS-MERRILL and JUDICIAL WATCH, INCORPORATED
Amicus Curiae:
CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER, STACEY STITT, MARIA DIAZ and others
League of Women Voters of Nort v. State of North Carolina
as 16-1474
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, MAJA KRICKER, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA D. MALCOLM, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF GEORGIA, LINDSEY GRAHAM and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
ASGOD BARRANTES, BRIAN M. MILLER, EBONY N. WEST and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SARA STOHLER, KAY BRANDON, UNIFOUR ONESTOP COLLABORATIVE and others
N.C. State Conference v. Patrick McCrory
as 16-1468
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF TEXAS, LINDSEY GRAHAM, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARMENTA EATON, BETHEL A. BAPTIST CHURCH, EMMANUEL BAPTIST CHURCH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MAJA KRICKER, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA D. MALCOLM, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, PAUL J. FOLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 3, NEW OXLEY HILL BAPTIST CHURCH, JOHN DOE 3 and others
League of Women Voters of Nort v. State of North Carolina
as 16-1469
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, MAJA KRICKER, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA D. MALCOLM, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF GEORGIA, LINDSEY GRAHAM and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
ASGOD BARRANTES, CHARLES M. GRAY and MARY-WREN RITCHIE
Not Yet Classified:
BECKY HURLEY MOCK, LOUIS M. DUKE, BRIAN M. MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA, OCTAVIA RAINEY, NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
