Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv40106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv40106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04184
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv01032
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 (b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
Fitzhenry v. Lily Management and Marketing Company LLC et al
as 2:2014cv03866
Plaintiff:
Mark Fitzhenry
Defendant:
Lily Management and Marketing Company LLC and Westgate Resorts Ltd
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
WESTGATE RESORTS, LTD. v. KENNEDY FUNDING, INC.
as 2:2012cv04979
Petitioner:
WESTGATE RESORTS, LTD.
Respondent:
KENNEDY FUNDING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
CFI Sales & Marketing Ltd v. Judith A. Parker
as 11-239
Petitioner:
JUDITH A. PARKER, individually and on behalf of other similarly situated, CAROLINE JORDAN, individually and on behalf of other similarly situated, CHRISTOPHER J. DECARO, individually and on behalf of other similarly situated and others
Respondent:
CFI SALES & MARKETING LTD, and its Successors in Interest by Merger, CFI SALES AND MARKETING LLC, d/b/a West Gate Resorts, CFI RESORTS MANAGEMENT INC and others
Debra Pittman, et al v. Westgate Planet Hollywood Las, et al
as 10-80210
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
DEBRA PITTMAN, ROSALYNE R. SMITH, MARKOS MENDOZA and others
Defendant - Respondent:
WESTGATE PLANET HOLLYWOOD LAS VEGAS, LLC, WESTGATE RESORTS, INC., WESTGATE RESORTS, LTD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
