Cases 41 - 50 of 79
Whirlpool Corporation v. Core Systems LLC
as 1:2013cv00181
Plaintiff:
Whirlpool Corporation
Defendant:
Core Systems LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Vitran Express, Inc. v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 1:2012cv01317
Plaintiff:
Vitran Express, Inc.
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE GROUP A/S/O RAYMOND AND TINA ZALENTY v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION
as 3:2012cv06284
Plaintiff:
NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE GROUP A/S/O RAYMOND AND TINA ZALENTY
Defendant:
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Randy Russell, et al v. Whirlpool Corp.
as 12-1451
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Randy Russell and Antoinette Russell
Defendant - Appellant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Deyco, Inc. v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 1:2012cv00128
Plaintiff:
Deyco, Inc.
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whirlpool Corporation v. The Grigoleit Company
as 11-2421
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
THE GRIGOLEIT COMPANY
Whirlpool Corporation v. China Pacific Property Insurance Company, Ltd. et al
as 1:2011cv01143
Plaintiff:
Whirlpool Corporation
Defendant:
China Pacific Property Insurance Company, Ltd. and Cunningham Lindsey, U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Whirlpool Corporation v. The Grigoleit Company
as 11-2348
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
THE GRIGOLEIT COMPANY
E.E. Reed Construction, L.P. v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 4:2011cv03618
Plaintiff:
E.E. Reed Construction, L.P.
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brethren Mutual Insurance Company v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 1:2011cv02718
Plaintiff:
Brethren Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
