Cases 11 - 20 of 78
Whitten v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2020cv01778
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Whitten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jamar Chambers v. Jeffrey Catoe, et al
as 19-40921
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAR CONRAD CHAMBERS
Defendant / Appellee:
WANDA OLIVER, WAYNE WHITTEN, HOLLIS L. WEBSTER, JR. and others
Auger Drilling Inc et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2019cv01376
Defendant:
Dean Johnson, Karol Johnson and Dean Basil Johnson
Debtor:
Auger Drilling, Inc
Plaintiff:
Coyle Whitten, Auger Drilling Inc and W Coyle Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Walker v. Johnson et al
as 3:2019cv00673
Defendant:
Deputy Smith, T Breaux, C L Fondren and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Lavelle Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierson v. White et al
as 5:2019cv00235
Defendant:
Attorney General New Mexico, Attorney General Arizona, San Diego County Sheriffs Office and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Pierson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitten v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2018cv11339
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Bayer AG and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chambers v. Catoe et al
as 6:2018cv00429
Defendant:
Deadra Martin, Jeffery W Catoe, Jeffery Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Jamar Conrad Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Sinton Indpendent School District et al
as 2:2018cv00101
Plaintiff:
Monica Roberts
Defendant:
Sinton Indpendent School District, Pari Whitten and Esteban Suarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitten v. Davis
as 1:2017cv01176
Respondent:
Director Lorie Davis
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
William Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitten v. Cuckler MD et al
as 3:2017cv01880
Plaintiff:
Gregory Whitten
Defendant:
John Cuckler, Alabama Medical Consultants Inc, Biomet Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
