Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Haulmark v. Wichita, City of et al
as 6:2021cv01182
Plaintiff:
Chris Haulmark
Defendant:
Wichita, City of and Brandon Whipple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jones v. Wichita, City of
as 6:2020cv01142
Defendant:
Wichita, City of
Plaintiff:
Terrell R. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Payton (ID 66352) v. Ballinger et al
as 5:2020cv03092
Defendant:
Ronald S. Trollope, Richard Ballinger, State of Kansas and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Payton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Wichita, City of et al
as 5:2019cv04101
Defendant:
Wichita, City of and Cathy Eaton
Plaintiff:
Mike Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
T-Mobile Central LLC et al v. Wichita, City of et al
as 6:2019cv01162
Plaintiff:
T-Mobile Central LLC and APC Towers III, LLC
Defendant:
Wichita, City of and Wichita City Council
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0332
Cochran v. City of Wichita, Kansas, et al
as 19-3059
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF LONGWELL, City of Wichita, City Mayor, PETE MEITZNER, City of Wichita, City Council; Council Member District II, TROY LIVINGSTON, City of Wichita Deputy Police Chief and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL T. COCHRAN
Arnold v. Wichita, City of, Police Department et al
as 5:2019cv03016
Defendant:
Rick M. Pena, Wichita, City of, Police Department and Bradley Berry
Plaintiff:
Lucas Julius Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ridley (ID 0117475) v. Sedgwick County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2018cv03011
Plaintiff:
Anthony Earl Ridley
Defendant:
Sedgwick County Sheriff's Office, Sandy R., (fnu) Kasper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cochran v. Wichita, City of et al
as 6:2018cv01007
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Cochran
Defendant:
Wichita, City of, Jeff Longwell, Lavonta Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
