Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. v. Wi-LAN Inc.
as 7:2026mc00277
Petitioner:
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Respondent:
Wi-LAN Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Fondon v. Brady et al
as 1:2026cv01276
Plaintiff:
Corey L Fondon
Defendant:
HSU Manager, Travis Brady, Warden Robert Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sagnay v. WI-FIBER, LLC et al
as 8:2026cv02832
Plaintiff:
Paul Sagnay
Defendant:
WI-FIBER, LLC, Adair GROVER and Dharmini DESAI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Qualcomm Incorporated et al v. Wi-LAN Inc.
as 1:2026mc01965
Petitioner:
Qualcomm Incorporated and Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Respondent:
Wi-LAN Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Brown v. Dunn et al
as 2:2026cv01542
Plaintiff:
Larona Brown
Defendant:
Devin Dunn and Retail Services WiS Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Henigan v. CCap WI Case Consolidation Clerk of Court
as 2:2026cv01237
Plaintiff:
Quinn Morgan Henigan and Storage Device Credit Counseling
Defendant:
CCap WI Case Consolidation Clerk of Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flores v. Lower East Side People's Credit Union et al
as 1:2026cv05813
Plaintiff:
Valerie Flores
Defendant:
Lower East Side People's Credit Union, Diana Gonzalez, Lucy Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Qualcomm Incorporated et al v. Wi-LAN Inc.
as 1:2026mc00314
Petitioner:
Qualcomm Incorporated and Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Respondent:
Wi-LAN Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Bradley, Brandon v. WI D.O.C. et al
as 3:2026cv00589
Plaintiff:
Brandon D. Bradley, Sr.
Defendant:
WI D.O.C., Lt. Bortz, Lt. Vires and others
Unknown:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-12235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
