Cases 1 - 10 of 15
US v. Feliciano-Rodriguez
as 23-1706
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
WILFREDO FELICIANO-RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Wilfre
Interested Party:
JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
US v. Feliciano-Rodriguez
as 23-1520
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
WILFREDO FELICIANO-RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Wilfre
Interested Party:
JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
US v. Feliciano-Rodriguez
as 23-1405
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
WILFREDO FELICIANO-RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Wilfre
Feliciano-Rodriguez v. US
as 15-1964
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILFREDO FELICIANO-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company v. Feliciano-Rivera et al
as 3:2015cv01285
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company
Defendant:
Wilfredo Feliciano-Rivera, Lourdes Milagros Rosario-Rivera and Conjugal Partnership Feliciano-Rosario
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IN RE: VINELAND POLICE CASES
as 1:2012cv07294
Plaintiff:
WILFREDO FELICIANO , RICHARD KATES , JOEL RIOS and others
Defendant:
CITY OF VINELAND , GAMALIEL "GAMI" CRUZ , POLICE CHIEF TIMOTHY CODISPONTI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
FELICIANO v. CITY OF VINELAND et al
as 1:2012cv03314
Plaintiff:
WILFREDO FELICIANO
Defendant:
CITY OF VINELAND, GAMALIEL "GAMI" CRUZ, TIMOTHY CODISPOTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brian R Carlson et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 2:2011cv10621
Plaintiff:
Edwin Aldana, Audrene Ann Alencastre, Lephas Bailey and others
Defendant:
California Reconveyance Company, Casas and Hipotecas, Chase Home Finance LLC and others
Feliciano-Rodriguez v. USA
as 3:2011cv01655
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Wilfredo Feliciano-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bobby Zidell v. USA, et al
as 10-10824
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY ZIDELL
Defendant - Appellee:
GORDEN KANAN, M.D., BUTCH TUBERA, M.D., C.D., EDDIE QUEZA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
