Cases 1 - 10 of 26
MARTINEZ v. BEST et al
as 2:2023cv02114
Plaintiff:
WILFREDO MARTINEZ
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER NICOLE BEST, CORRECTIONS OFFICER WILLS, HEARING EXAMINER I. YODIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Wilfredo Martinez Lopez v. William Barr
as 20-71140
Petitioner:
WILFREDO MARTINEZ LOPEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
MARTINEZ JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv33026
Plaintiff:
WILFREDO MARTINEZ JR
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tatiana Sanchez Montecino, et al v. William Barr
as 19-3438
Petitioner:
TATIANA BEATRIZ SANCHEZ MONTECINO and ANDRES WILFREDO MARTINEZ SANCHEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Tillman v. Martinez, Jr. et al
as 1:2017cv05404
Plaintiff:
Tyson Tillman
Defendant:
Wilfredo Martinez, Jr. and Chicago Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pagan-Prorrata et al v. Municipio de Guaynabo et al
as 3:2017cv01961
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Pagan-Prorrata , Anibal Jimenez , Daniel Cumbas-Aponte and others
Defendant:
Municipio de Guaynabo and Wilfredo Martinez-Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Martinez et al v. FSA Logistix, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00321
Plaintiff:
Wilfredo Martinez , Jose Evangelista , Scipio Reid and others
Defendant:
FSA Logistix, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MARTINEZ ACOSTA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03507
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
WILFREDO MARTINEZ ACOSTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Martinez, et al v. Apex Coach LLC, et al
as 5:2016cv00228
Plaintiff:
Wilfredo Martinez and Wilfredo Ortiz
Defendant:
Apex Coach LLC and Eric Tyrek Jimmerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
