Cases 31 - 40 of 1,814
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Defendant:
Melody M. Maddox, Steven Blackmon and Tyrone Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harrison v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Winston L. Harrison
Defendant:
Bruce Maddox, Marvin W. Wiggins, Erica K. Kemmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GEICO v. Aparicio et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
GEICO
Defendant:
Michael Aparicio, Maddox, Inc. and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
MOORE v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES et al
as 5:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
VIVIAN D MOORE
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, APALACHEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
D' Ambrosio v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Nikko D' Ambrosio, Facebook Entertainment LLC and Facebook, LLC
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Abbigail Rajala, Rodney Rajala and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gary Corbitt v. Henry County Commission, et al
as 24-10043
Plaintiff:
GARY CORBITT
Defendant:
HENRY COUNTY COMMISSION, WILL MADDOX, JULIAN ALVARADO and others
Williams v. Campbell, et al.
as 1:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell, Director Atencio, Director Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Urve Maggitti v. Bret Binder, et al
as 23-3277
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
BRET M. BINDER, DEBRA RYAN, DANIEL E. ROLAND and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
