Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Thomason v. Dart
as 1:2014cv05298
Plaintiff: Joseph R. Thomason
Defendant: Tom J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomason v. Dart
as 1:2014cv05297
Plaintiff: Joseph R. Thomason
Defendant: Tom J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomason v. Dart
as 1:2014cv04363
Plaintiff: Joseph R. Thomason
Defendant: Tom J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv00465
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00413
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
THOMASON et al v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv88238
Plaintiff: JOHN R. THOMASON and MAE ELIZABETH THOMASON
Defendant: A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
THOMASON v. U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
as 2:2009cv88910
Plaintiff: JOHN R. THOMASON
Defendant: U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
Hines v. Sherron, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-6085
Plaintiff - Appellant: THURMAN HARVEY HINES
Defendant - Appellee: EUGENIA SHERRON, Law Library Supervisor, JDCC, WILL R. THOMASON, Lt. and Contraband Officer, JDCC, TERESA ALEXANDER, Unit Manager, JDCC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008at00713
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Type: Civil Rights None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01845
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?