Cases 1 - 10 of 142
(PC) Iseli v. Johnson
as 2:2024cv01210
Plaintiff:
Branden Willie Iseli
Defendant:
William D. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Iseli v. Lynch et al
as 2:2024cv00800
Plaintiff:
Branden Willie Iseli
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch and William D Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Harnett County Detention Center
as 5:2024ct03046
Plaintiff:
William Kirk Johnson
Defendant:
Harnett County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Superior Courts of Glynn County et al
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Imare' Damu' F.J. Franklin
Defendant:
Superior Courts of Glynn County and William Bill Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Imare' Damu' F.J. Franklin
Defendant:
William Bill Johnson, Rebecca J. Walden and District Attorney's of Glynn County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Johnson v. R. Hudgins
as 23-6915
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM ANTHONY JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
R. HUDGINS, Warden
Johnson v. Keys et al
as 6:2023cv01752
Plaintiff:
William Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
Chaplain Teddy Keys, Assistant Warden Charles Driggers, Secretary Department Of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BROWN v. KELLY et al
as 1:2023cv00682
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. BROWN
Defendant:
WARDEN MIKE KELLY, SGT. LISA JOHNSON, DON GEIGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
