Cases 1 - 10 of 14
ROY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv65326
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JOHN ROY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KOESTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv32300
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEE ROY KOESTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roy v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv06655
Plaintiff:
William C. Roy
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elijah Ford v. Michael Kennerly, et al
as 17-1583
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELIJAH M. FORD
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL C. KENNERLY, Physician Assistant, ROGER A. GERLACH, Medical Doctor, RICHARD CZOP, Medical Doctor and others
Ford #374376 v. Kennerly et al
as 1:2016cv00243
Plaintiff:
Elijah M. Ford #374376
Defendant:
Michael C. Kennerly, Roger Gerlach, Richard Czop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malicoat v. Obenland
as 3:2014cv05578
Petitioner:
William James Roy Malicoat
Respondent:
Mike Obenland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PNC Bank, N.A. v. Roy et al
as 6:2013cv01844
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
William J. Roy, Barry Richardson and Unknown Tenants in Possession
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROY v. WADE et al
as 3:2012cv00322
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R ROY
Defendant:
DAVID N WADE , COWAN SYSTEMS, LLC and COWAN EQUIPMENT LEASING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROY v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72453
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM T. ROY
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barbara Roy, et al v. Michigan Child Care Centers, I, et al
as 09-1872
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARBARA A. ROY and WILLIAM GLENN ROY, III
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN CHILD CARE CENTERS, INC. and ROBIN A. PAUL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
