Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Morgan v. Wamp
as 1:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Charles Van Morgan
Defendant:
Coty Wamp, Scott Allen, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morgan v. Wamp
as 3:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Charles Van Morgan
Defendant:
Coty Wamp, Scott Allen, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. City of Lincoln et al
as 4:2019cv03051
Plaintiff:
William Adams
Defendant:
City of Lincoln and Jeffrey Sorensen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Madigan et al
as 1:2018cv05629
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Lisa Madigan, Cook County Jail Administration and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Steven Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Madigan et al
as 1:2018cv02843
Plaintiff:
Todd Steven Adams
Defendant:
Lisa Madigan, Illinois Circuit Court Administration, Cook County Sheriff's Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardin v. Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government et al
as 3:2017cv00420
Defendant:
Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government, City of Louisville, Meade County and others
Plaintiff:
Garr Keith Hardin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government et al
as 3:2017cv00419
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Dewayne Clark
Defendant:
Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government, City of Louisville, Meade County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Adams v. Gregory Stokes, et al
as 16-16669
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY STOKES, Police Officer and KENNETH KING
GUTHRIE et al v. MIDDLE TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2013cv06081
Plaintiff:
TERRI GUTHRIE and LEONARD GUTHRIE
Defendant:
MIDDLE TOWNSHIP, WILLIAM ADAMS, RON MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Adams v. Gregory Stoke
as 12-13196
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILLIAM ADAMS
Defendant - Appellant:
GREGORY STOKES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
