Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Baldwin v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 2:2024cv11027
Plaintiff:
William Baldwin
Defendant:
Sam's Club East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
BALDWIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv32611
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BALDWIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BALDWIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21590
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BALDWIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SOROKAPUT v. BONNER et al
as 4:2022cv00928
Plaintiff:
Peter Sorokaput
Defendant:
James Bonner, Schuylkill County Prison and William Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peter Sorokaput v. Jennifer Foose, et al
as 22-2057
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER J. SOROKAPUT
Defendant:
JENNIFER FOOSE, Assistant District Attorney, JAMES BONNER, Police Officer and WILLIAM BALDWIN, Judge
SOROKAPUT v. BONNER et al
as 2:2022cv02207
Plaintiff:
PETER SOROKAPUT
Defendant:
JAMES BONNER, SCHUYLKILL COUNTY PRISON and WILLIAM BALDWIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SOROKAPUT v. BONNER et al
as 1:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
PETER SOROKAPUT
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER JAMES BONNER, SCHUYLKILL COUNTY PRISON and JUDGE WILLIAM BALDWIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sorokaput v. Foose et al
as 3:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Sorokaput
Defendant:
Jennifer Foose, James Bonner and William Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BALDWIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55288
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN WILLIAM BALDWIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caccia v. Wapinski et al
as 3:2021cv01447
Plaintiff:
William A. Caccia, II
Defendant:
Warden David Wapinski, D.A. Michale Opake and William Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
