Cases 1 - 10 of 67
DUNCAN v. GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2021cv01209
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DUNCAN
Defendant:
GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Duncan v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00038
Plaintiff:
William Duncan
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Marshall v. George et al
as 4:2020cv12935
Defendant:
Ryhs, Ron Wiles, Nick George and others
Plaintiff:
Delmond Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. George et al
as 1:2020cv00722
Defendant:
Ron Wiles, Nick George, Marcus Ferguson and others
Plaintiff:
Delmond Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2020cv01560
Defendant:
Angus Fire, Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, Dowdupont Inc and others
Plaintiff:
William Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clarence Otworth v. Fifth Third Bank, et al
as 20-1286
Defendant / Appellee:
PHILLIP C. BODLE, An individual, WILLIAM DUNCAN SCHUETTE, Former Michigan Attorney General, WILLIAMS & HUGHES, Law firm in Muskegon, MI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE MATTHEW OTWORTH
Clarence Otworth v. Fifth Third Bank, et al
as 20-1156
Defendant / Appellee:
PHILLIP C. BODLE, An individual, WILLIAM DUNCAN SCHUETTE, Former Michigan Attorney General, WILLIAMS & HUGHES, Law firm in Muskegon, MI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE MATTHEW OTWORTH
DUNCAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv08004
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DUNCAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marshall v. George et al
as 4:2019cv13604
Defendant:
Ryhs, Ron Wiles, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Delmond Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. George et al
as 1:2019cv00923
Defendant:
Ron Wiles, Unknown Part(y)(ies) #3, Nick George and others
Plaintiff:
Delmond Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
