Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Ferguson v. BlendedTraditions Inc. et al.
as 5:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
William Ferguson
Defendant:
BlendedTraditions Inc. and Tasha N. Harris
Davis v. Terrell et al
as 6:2024cv00546
Plaintiff:
Brian Davis
Defendant:
Robert Terrell, J. Richard Espinosa, ADM Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Terrell et al
as 4:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Brian Davis
Defendant:
Robert Terrell, J. Richard Espinosa, ADM Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Arrington et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
Everett Arrington, John Collins, Loretta Maynor and others
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
William Ferguson v. Superintendent Albion SCI, et al
as 23-3012
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM FERGUSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rosemore v. Mineral County Sheriffs Office et al
as 3:2021cv00451
Plaintiff:
Bryce Rosemore and Bryce Aaron Rosemore
Defendant:
Mineral County Sheriffs Office, William Ferguson, Brian Anguiano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FERGUSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv65201
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FERGUSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FERGUSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv05790
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN WILLIAM FERGUSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marconi v. City of Hollywood et al
as 0:2020cv61559
Defendant:
Sergio Lopez, James Lowndes, Tamatha Alvarez and others
Plaintiff:
David J Marconi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
