Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Johnson et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv01320
Plaintiff:
Teaka LeighAnn Johnson and William Johnson
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00924
Plaintiff:
Mary Beth Johnson and William Johnson
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRONIN v. DUFFEY et al
as 5:2013cv03423
Plaintiff:
Dmitry Pronin
Defendant:
SCOTT DUFFEY, VERONICA HNAT, BRIAN BOLLINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. USA
as 1:2013cv00942
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
William Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ladouceur et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01333
Plaintiff:
Peggy A. Ladouceur and William Johnson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv09868
Plaintiff:
Lisa Johnson and William Johnson
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00704
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Oliver v. Hines et al
as 1:2012cv01032
Plaintiff:
Jane Williams Oliver
Defendant:
Charleyrene Danforth Hines , Patricia D'Rene Dan Lethgo , Mary Kate Williams Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnes v. Pitt County Municipal Government et al
as 5:2012ct03145
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Alexander Barnes
Defendant:
Pitt County Municipal Government, Elks, Major Whaley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Johnson et al
as 5:2011ct03056
Plaintiff:
Raymond Jones, III
Defendant:
William Johnson and Major Whaley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
