Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Benton v. Russell, et al
as 3:2023cv01259
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Benton
Defendant:
Tracy Ann Russell, David Stephens and William K. Davis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benton v. Fahlgren et al
as 3:2023cv00779
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Benton
Defendant:
S. Fahlgren, Circuit Court of 4th Judicial Circuit for Duval County, Florida, William K. Davis, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIS II v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv15820
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM K. DAVIS II and WILLIAM K DAVIS, II
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KLAPP v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13162
Plaintiff:
ADAM KLAPP, CHARLES KINNARD, DARRIUS PEARSON and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Klapp et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01485
Plaintiff:
Adam Klapp, Charles Kinnard, Darrius Pearson and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Davis et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv16422
Plaintiff:
Tammi L. Davis and William K. Davis
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv11685
Plaintiff:
Teresa Ann Davis and William K. Davis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-13986
Plaintiff:
Teresa Ann Davis and William K. Davis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Davis et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv13986
Plaintiff:
Teresa Ann Davis and William K. Davis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Davis
as 2:2012mc51189
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
William K. Davis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
