Cases 1 - 10 of 17
FAULK v. WRIGHT et al
as 5:2020cv00270
Defendant:
WILLIAM L WRIGHT and CHRISTINA PUMPHREY
Plaintiff:
MARIO SANCHEZ FAULK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. DIAMOND et al
as 2:2018cv03067
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L. WRIGHT, III
Defendant:
PAUL S. DIAMOND and KATE BARKMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. LEESON et al
as 2:2018cv01546
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L. WRIGHT, III
Defendant:
JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. and JEREMY H.G. IBRAHIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Partridge et al v. Equifax et al
as 1:2017cv05419
Plaintiff:
Diane Platts, Julia Mendoza, Milo Gene Kartchner, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Equifax and Equifax Information Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Partridge et al v. Equifax et al
as UT/2:17-cv-01017
Plaintiff:
Tom Partridge , Zane L. Christensen , Jennifer J. Christensen and others
Defendant:
Equifax and Equifax Information Services, LLC
Partridge et al v. Equifax et al
as 2:2017cv01017
Plaintiff:
Tom Partridge , Zane L. Christensen , Jennifer J. Christensen and others
Defendant:
Equifax and Equifax Information Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
as KS/6:15-cv-01268
Plaintiff:
William L. Wright
Defendant:
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Counter_defendant:
William L. Wright
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. WRIGHT et al
as 3:2015cv00260
Plaintiff:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
WILLIAM L. WRIGHT, III
Respondent:
DEFENDER ASSOCIATION OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WRIGHT v. WENEROWICZ
as 2:2014cv00245
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L. WRIGHT, III
Defendant:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, C.O. GRAHAM, C.O. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNES v. WRIGHT et al.
as 5:2013cv00182
Plaintiff:
TROY A BARNES
Defendant:
WILLIAM L WRIGHT, JOHN ALLEN, CYNTHIA QUIVEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
