Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Cumalander v. BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee, Inc.
as 7:2023cv01174
Plaintiff:
William Mark Cumalander
Defendant:
BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Brockmeyer v. Stirling et al
as 1:2023cv01645
Petitioner:
William Mark Brockmeyer
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling and Kirkland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ashby v. Greenville County Detention Center
as 8:2019cv00926
Plaintiff:
William Ashby and William Mark Ashby
Defendant:
Greenville County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rover Pipeline LLC v. ROVER TRACT NO(S). WV-DO-SHC-046.000 et al
as 1:2019cv00048
Defendant:
Martha Lee Williams, Pam Saunders, ROVER TRACT NO(S). WV-DO-SHC-046.000 and others
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Ashby v. Tollison et al
as 8:2016cv02581
Plaintiff:
William Mark Ashby
Defendant:
Officer Tollison, Officer Morgan and Joe Tyson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashby v. Johnson Detention Center et al
as 8:2015cv04727
Plaintiff:
William Mark Ashby
Defendant:
Johnson Detention Center, Laurens County, Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashby v. Aiken et al
as 8:2015cv04461
Plaintiff:
William Mark Ashby
Defendant:
Joseph Aiken, Johnson Detention Center, Lauren County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Krings v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2015cv00114
Plaintiff:
William Mark Krings
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
