Cases 1 - 10 of 19
McCollum v. AT&T Services Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01513
Plaintiff:
William McCollum
Defendant:
AT&T Services Inc and AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
McCollum v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00532
Petitioner:
David William McCollum
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCCOLLUM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv05408
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MCCOLLUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Huber v. Reichert et al
as 5:2012cv03175
Plaintiff:
James Jay Huber
Defendant:
Edith Reichert, Sara Revell, FNU LNU (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
US v. William McCollum, Jr.
as 12-6544
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM MCCOLLUM, JR.
White v. Buser, et al
as 09-3322
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN JAMES WHITE, FDBA James Richard White
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE G. BUSER, Acting Unit Manager, USP-Leavenworth, WILLIAM MCCOLLUM, MD, USP-Leavenworth, JOHN DRENAN, (SIC) Administrator of Health Services, USP-Leavenworth and others
Strobridge v. McNeil et al
as 0:2009cv61574
Plaintiff:
Anthony Strobridge
Defendant:
Walter A. McNeil, Martha Humphries and William McCollum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Strobridge v. McNeil et al
as 1:2009cv61574
Plaintiff:
Anthony Strobridge
Defendant:
Walter A. McNeil, Martha Humphries and William McCollum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haug et al v. Township of New Lenox et al
as 1:2009cv05084
Plaintiff:
Michael Haug, John Palica, Jr and Mary Cates-Palica
Defendant:
Township of New Lenox, Board of Trustees of Township of New Lenox, William McCollum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
