Cases 1 - 10 of 48
THOMAS v. MILLER et al
as 4:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
MARIO M THOMAS
Defendant:
JAMES WILLIAM MILLER, SHAWN SWAIN and DAWN A HART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Tony Hines
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Warden Breitenbach, Robert Suwe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahe v. Frazier et al
as 3:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Jason A. Mahe
Defendant:
F Frazier, J. Henley, R. Hartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. NNCC et al
as 3:2022cv00531
Plaintiff:
Terrance E. Williams
Defendant:
Hodge, William Miller, Brendel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunez v. Bentivegna et al
as 1:2022cv05673
Plaintiff:
Toby Nunez
Defendant:
Dr. Robert Bentivegna, Kyoung S. Kim, Mary Ashong and others
Interested Party:
NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE-GENERIC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Disilvestro, et al.
as 1:2021cv00251
Defendant:
Mentino Disilvestro, Kahn, Mark Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Yaider et al
as 1:2020cv01843
Defendant:
Kimberly Stewart, C.O. II J. Yaider and William Miller
Plaintiff:
Brandon Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Kynard #298848 v. Miller et al
as 2:2019cv05157
Plaintiff:
James Ervin Kynard
Defendant:
Mark Brown, Michael Anthony Minicozzi, Pamela D Svoboda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MENNA v. LAWRENCE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2019cv00178
Defendant:
JANE DOE, ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, INC., MIKE BRANHAM and others
Plaintiff:
ANGELA MENNA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence v. Scott et al
as 3:2019cv00317
Defendant:
Shawn MacBeth, Curtis Cowell, Anthony Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Denzil Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
