Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Udell v. Martin County Sheriff Office et al
as 2:2015cv14252
Plaintiff:
Spencer Lee Udell
Defendant:
Martin County Sheriff Office , William D. Snyder , Justin Frank Albauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv04585
Defendant:
Detective Emrah Ates, City of New York and Police Officers John Doe
Plaintiff:
Faith Bell, Timothy Bell and William Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VEGA v. VENZ
as 4:2013cv00629
Plaintiff:
JUAN FRANCISCO VEGA, CARLOS RUIZ, WILLIAM MORALES and others
Defendant:
GREGORY VENZ and DONALD SAWYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morales v. Speedling, Incorporated et al
as 8:2013cv00991
Plaintiff:
William Morales
Defendant:
Speedling, Incorporated, MDT Personnel, LLC and Labor Ready Southeast, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Morales v. Brighthaupt
as 3:2012cv00206
Petitioner:
William Morales
Respondent:
J. Brighthaupt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MORALES et al v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2011cv06585
Plaintiff:
WILSON MORALES, WILLIAM MORALES and GREGORY R. RAVENELL
Defendant:
GARY LANIGAN, GREG BARTOWSKI, JIM BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ACOSTA v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv55998
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MORALES ACOSTA
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
William Morales v. Captain Elli
as 11-14968
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM MORALES
Defendant - Appellee:
ELLIS, Captain
:
SERVICE
Morales-Cruz et al v. Gamboa et al
as 3:2011cv01628
Plaintiff:
William Morales-Cruz
Defendant:
Israel Gamboa, Jane Doe, Insurance Company ABC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
William Morales v. Sec. Dept.of Children & Famie
as 11-11924
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM MORALES
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
